The purpose of this section is to summarise information from recently completed research and evaluation studies in Queensland.
Intending contributors should forward a short abstract of their work, together with relevant biographical data, to: The Editor, Queensland Researcher, Research Services, Queensland Department of Education, PO Box 33, North Quay Q 4002.
Title: | Roma Middle School - A report on school organisation and curriculum development |
Author: | John Lee, Barry Tainton |
Institution: | Research Services, Division of Curriculum Services, Department of Education, Queensland |
Date: | October 1989 |
Also over this period of time, a number of projects located within Research Services have been undertaken as part of the Department's focus on its P- 10 program. Roma Middle School has provided Research Services with an opportunity to collect information relating to a range of P-10 curriculum implementation issues that would be of interest at the school, regional and system levels.
Early in 1989, meetings with Roma Middle School staff, South Western Region personnel and officers from the Division of Curriculum Services were held to discuss their various information needs. Subsequently, officers from Research Services visited the school in May 1989 with a view to collecting information that would:
Over a period of two days at the school, interviews were conducted with the executive team, curriculum coordinators, groups of Year level teachers and students. As well, observations were made of whole school activities, individual class lessons, small group teaching situations and general school ground activities.
Since opening in 1987, the school has engaged in the task of providing a balanced, comprehensive, sound and general education for students from Years 4 to 10 in the one educational institution, and yet be flexible enough to be able to respond to the students individual strengths, interests and styles of learning. Faced with these dual challenges, the staff of the school embarked on an extensive curriculum development program that would enable students to experience continuity of learning as they progressed through the Year levels and growth across developmental stages from middle childhood to adolescence. Concurrent with this was the need to develop appropriate support and organisational structures within a school that had elements of primary and secondary education.
Roma Middle School is successfully addressing these challenges to date. This report has outlined the range of curricula presented to students, the various structural arrangements that have been used, the organisational and support measures available to both teachers and students, and other considerations that the school had to accommodate in its efforts to provide quality educational experiences for students from Years 4 to 10 in the one facility.
If the progress of Roma Middle School is to be further monitored, a number of considerations may need to be taken into account. In the first place, the conduct of external reviews such as the present one, can provide a school with the opportunity to reflect on information provided by independent observers. The school, as part of its ongoing responsibilities to develop and maintain responsive school programs, also needs to generate information in a coordinated and systematic fashion to enhance the quality of educational decision-making. Experience has shown that, where both internal and external sources of information are taken advantage of in the consideration of school development initiatives, more benefits for students ensue.
Title: | Managing the Effects of Change in Secondary Education |
Author: | E. D. Hobbs |
Institution: | Research Services, Division of Curriculum Services, Department of Education, Queensland |
Date: | November 1989 |
In recent years, schools and school systems have been attempting to adapt to increased participation rates, broadening demands from various sectors of society, increased pressure and tighter selection for tertiary places, changing assessment and certification practices, and calls to relate senior schooling more closely to entry to the workforce. Indications have been observed that significant problems are accompanying the changes that have been occurring. There are signs among school administrative and teaching staff of stress and unrest associated with rapid change.
If change is a problem, one response is to try to halt the tide of change. The more realistic alternative is to manage the change process itself as far as this is possible, and at the same time, to manage the effects of the change.
The research study summarised here was intended to investigate the nature of current concerns within secondary schools towards changes in secondary education, and explore strategies for managing the effects of such change.
Interviews were held with administrative and teaching staff in State secondary schools in order to elicit:
For teachers, the major category of concern was ROSBA, including changes to assessment requirements and the rewriting of work programs in Board subjects. Generally, teachers supported the concepts behind ROSBA and the various changes, but complained of extra work and time pressure associated with the changes. Many were frustrated, angry or confused about the changes.
Changes associated with the P-10 Curriculum initiative were nominated by all staff groups. While the general concepts behind P-10 were widely accepted, many complained of a lack of clear, consistent information, causing confusion and misunderstanding among staff.
Curriculum changes in senior secondary were nominated by many of the teachers, subject masters and deputy principals. These changes were well supported by staff, even though they did mean extra work.
The source of most of the changes nominated was perceived to be either the Department or the government. ROSBA changes were usually perceived as originating with the Board of Secondary School Studies. Some of the changes were seen as originating either within the school (usually well supported) or external to the system (usually unwelcome social change). The regional office was seldom seen as a source of the nominated changes.
Concerning change that is needed, many called for more curriculum change in the senior years.
Some claimed that recent changes generally have not addressed those aspects which are of most concern at the school or classroom levels.
The 10 Strategies are listed and briefly described below:
Strategy 1: Time Allowance: People need both lead time and time off to implement changes. They need lead time to find out what the change means, to come to understand the driving ideas and the practical detail, to adjust to and accept the ideas and detail, and to prepare for the implementation. They need time off in order to carry out the additional work involved in implementation.
Strategy 2: Essential Information: School staff need to be prepared for the implementation of proposed change by the supply of essential information, which establishes a clear direction for the change, and relates it to other changes occurring or proposed.
Strategy 3: Persuasion: The commitment or agreement of all affected by the change needs to be gained in a campaign to persuade people of the necessity or advantages of the change. A successful campaign would focus on actual benefits to teachers and students, preferably at the classroom level.
Strategy 4: School Level Support: Where changes require action by school staff, a supportive environment at the school level should be created. Ideally, the school administration supports the change, and a climate of trust prevails. Subject masters, as key people, must be in support of the change.
Strategy 5: Higher-Level Support: Support from the regional or central office level consists of backing up the implementation of change in palpable forms, such as money, support staff, teacher release and resources.
Strategy 6: Promotion of Adaptiveness: In times when change is necessary, a general receptiveness to change and willingness to adapt need to be fostered. In other words, a change mentality has to be developed.
Strategy 7: Devolution: Many of the suggestions above would be most effectively applied where knowledge of local people and situations is greatest, that is at regional or school levels. This requires substantial degrees of both responsibility and flexibility at those levels.
Strategy 8: Containment: The management of change includes containment of the change implementation. This means focusing on a few aspects or issues rather than trying to solve all problems at once. Gradual implementation is controlled according to a schedule.
Strategy 9: Practicality: If school staff can have confidence that proposed changes are realistic and practical, they may more readily accept and adopt the changes. Practicality perceived is a precondition to acceptance at school level.
Strategy 10: Systematic Processes: Staff were critical of changes they perceived to be poorly thought out, or implemented in hasty or disorganised ways. A well planned, systematically implemented change would be based on a clear rationale, preceded by consistent, clear information, based on research or documented experience, accompanied by analysis of consequences, tried and evaluated, and phased in to a schedule.
These four cornerstones of teacher support are displayed below.
The six attributes are:
Copies of Research Report: Managing the Effects of Change in Secondary Education are available from Research Services, Division of Curriculum Services, Department of Education, PO Box 33, North Quay Q 4002.
Please cite as: QIER (1990). Research reports. Queensland Researcher, 6(1), 20-31. http://www.iier.org.au/qjer/qr6/reports-6-1.html |